不同水稻品种对纹枯病的抗病性差异分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S435.111.4+2

基金项目:

现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(CARS-01)


Analysis of Resistance Difference of Different Rice Varieties to Sheath Blight
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为明确黑龙江省水稻品种对纹枯病的抗病性差异及抗病性评价的病情分级标准的合理性,选用黑龙江省44个水稻品种,采取人工接种的方法进行对比试验,参照国家农业行业标准《水稻抗纹枯病鉴定技术规范》(NY/T2720-2015)中制定的水稻成株期纹枯病抗病性评价分级标准和抗性评价标准,确定抗病品种8个,占参试品种的18.2%;中抗品种21个,占参试品种的47.7%;感病品种14个,占参试品种的31.8%;高感品种1个,占参试品种的2.3%。该结论可为水稻抗纹枯病育种提供优良抗性资源。另外,通过试验结果证明改进的分级标准是可行的,适用于黑龙江省水稻品种抗纹枯病的鉴定。

    Abstract:

    In order to clarify the difference of resistance of rice varieties to sheath blight in Heilongjiang Province and the rationality of disease grading criteria for resistance evaluation, 44 rice varieties in Heilongjiang Province were selected for comparative test by artificial inoculation method. The grading standard and resistance evaluation standard for resistance evaluation of sheath blight at mature-plant stage were established according to the national agricultural industry standard“Technical specification for identification of rice resistance to sheath blight”(NY/T2720-2015). 8 resistant varieties were determined, accounting for 18.2% of the tested rice varieties, 21 moderately resistant varieties, accounting for 47.7% of the tested rice varieties, 14 susceptible varieties, accounting for 31.8% of the tested rice varieties, and 1 highly susceptible variety, accounting for 2.3% of the tested rice varieties, which can provide excellent resistance sources for rice resistance breeding. In addition, the test results proved that the improved grading standard is feasible and suitable for the identification of rice varieties in Heilongjiang Province.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邵丽华,李鹏.不同水稻品种对纹枯病的抗病性差异分析[J].东北农业科学,2024,49(4):31-34.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码