排酸处理对沃金黑牛肉品质的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S823.9+2

基金项目:

吉林省科技发展计划重大科技专项(YDZJ202203CGZH049、YDZJ202203CGZH039);现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-37)


The Effect of Acid Discharge on Meat Quality of Woking Black Cattle
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究排酸处理对沃金黑牛肉品质的影响,选择体重接近、健康无病、发育正常的沃金黑牛8头,同一饲养管理,饲养至30月龄进行屠宰,宰后取同一背最长肌12~13肋处西冷部位,试验分为未排酸组和排酸组(4℃排酸6 d),分别测定剪切力、肉色、加压失水率、离心失水率、蒸煮损失、滴水损失、熟肉率、pH值等食用品质参数,水分、粗蛋白、肌内脂肪等营养品质参数以及黏合力、凝聚性、弹性、黏结性、黏性、咀嚼度、硬度等质构特性参数。结果表明,食用品质:未排酸处理组肉样与排酸处理组肉样的pH值、加压失水率、离心损失、滴水损失、剪切力之间差异极显著(P<0.01)。肉色L*值:未排酸处理组、排酸处理24 h组、排酸处理6 d组差异极显著(P<0.01)。肉色a*值:未排酸处理组和排酸处理24 h组差异不显著(P>0.05),与排酸处理6 d组差异极显著(P<0.01)。肉色b*值:未排酸处理组和排酸处理24 h组差异显著(P<0.05),未排酸处理组和排酸处理24 h组分别与排酸处理6 d组差异极显著(P<0.01)。未排酸处理组肉样与排酸处理组肉样的熟肉率、蒸煮损失之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。营养品质:未排酸处理组肉样和排酸处理组肉样粗蛋白差异显著(P<0.05)。未排酸处理组肉样和排酸处理组肉样的水分、肌内脂肪之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。质构特性:未排酸处理组肉样与排酸处理组肉样黏合力、弹性差异极显著(P<0.01)。未排酸处理组肉样与排酸处理组肉样凝聚性、黏结性、硬度差异显著(P<0.05)。未排酸处理组肉样与排酸处理组肉样黏性、咀嚼度差异不显著(P>0.05)。综上食用品质、营养品质以及质构特性分析得出,低温排酸处理6 d组的沃金黑牛肉品质整体上优于未排酸处理组。

    Abstract:

    To study the effect of acid discharge on meat quality of Woking black catle.8 Woking black cattle of close weight, healthy, free from disease and normal development were selected to study, which fed to 30 months for slaughter in the same feeding condition. After slaughter, the same dorsal longest muscle was taken at 12-13 ribs in the sirloin area. The test was divided into no acid group and acid group(acid at 4℃ for 6 d). The evaluating eating quality parameters such as shear force, meat color, pressing loss, centrifuging loss, cooking loss, drip loss, cooked meat rate,pH value, nutritional quality parameters such as moisture, crude protein, intramuscular fat, and textural characteristics parameters such as adhesion, cohesiveness, springiness, bonding, stickiness, chewiness, hardness etc. were measured separately. The results showed that: Evaluating eating quality, the differences between the pH value, pressing loss, centrifuging loss, drip loss, and shear force of the no acid group and acid group were highly significant(P<00.01). The meat color L* values were highly significant(P<00.01) among no acid group, acid 24 h group and acid 6 d group. The meat color a* values, the differences between the no acid group and acid 24 h group were not significant(P>0.05), while the differences among no acid group, acid 24 h group and acid 6 d group were highly significant(P<00.01). The meat color b* values were significantly(P<00.05) different between no acid group and acid 24 h group,while highly different(P<00.01) among no acid group and acid 24 h group and acid 6 d group, respectively. There was no significant difference on the cooked meat rate and cooking loss between the no acid group and acid group(P>0.05). Nutritional quality,there was a significant difference in crude protein between the non acid group and acid group(P<00.05). There was no significant difference between the moisture and intramuscular fat of no acid group and acid group(P>0.05). Textural characteristics, the differences in adhesion and springiness between the no acid group and acid group were highly significant(P<00.01). The differences in cohesiveness, bonding and hardness between no acid group and acid group were significant(P<00.05). The differences in stickiness and chewiness between the no acid group and acid group were not significant(P>0.05). The meat analysis of evaluating eating quality, nutritional quality and textural characteristics of Woking black beef showed that the overall quality of Woking black beef of acid group was better than no acid group.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王蕾,刘笑笑,刘丽宅,赵云辉,张鑫,秦立红,宋桂莲,赵玉民,吴健.排酸处理对沃金黑牛肉品质的影响[J].东北农业科学,2024,49(6):65-71.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码