This study employs an improved CRITIC-super efficiency DEA model to conduct a three-dimensional efficiency evaluation of four types of livestock and poultry waste recycling models in the Mouping District. The results indicate that the village collective-led model exhibits the highest comprehensive efficiency (1.23), with land intensification and community trust mechanisms enabling economic-social-ecological balance; the enterprise-derived model leads in ecological efficiency (1.35), but has a significant shortcoming in social efficiency (0.94); the regional cooperative model has high ecological efficiency (1.25), but low economic efficiency (0.89); the individual farmer mutual aid model stands out in social efficiency (1.23), with the weakest ecological efficiency (0.88). The findings suggest that the effectiveness of the models depends on the dynamic adaptability of institutional frameworks and multidimensional goals. Future policies should adhere to the principle of "multidimensional adaptation and classified policies": prioritizing the promotion of the village collective-led model, strengthening its market operation capacity; balancing social inclusiveness and ecological efficiency for the enterprise-derived model; reducing collaborative costs and activating market transactions for the regional cooperative model; and achieving modernization for the individual farmer mutual aid model through digitization and institutionalization. Ultimately, a collaborative network of "village collective leadership-enterprise support-regional linkage-farmer participation" should be constructed.